Anti-fungal drug increases flu susceptibility

Common anti-fungal drug deactivates protein that protects against flu in mice

Anti-fungal drug increases flu susceptibility

ifitm3.jpghttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.10.033
AmphoB Prevents IFITM2- and IFITM3-Mediated Restriction, but Not Restriction by IFITM1

Researchers have found that a commonly used anti-fungal treatment increases susceptibility to severe influenza infection in mice. This treatment deactivates an important protein that protects against viral infections such as influenza.

Amphotericin B is an important anti-fungal treatment for people with already suppressed immune systems such as cancer patients and bone marrow transplant patients. Cells and mice treated with Amphotericin B lost the protective effects of IFITM3, a protein critical for protecting against viral infection. This increased their susceptibility to influenza infection.

"This is an important discovery and the consequences for patients on certain anti-fungal treatments should now be investigated. Preventative flu vaccinations, rapid antiviral therapy or alternative anti-fungal treatment could be offered to these patients when at risk of flu infection."

Professor Paul Kellam, author from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

The team discovered that when cell samples were treated with Amphotericin B, the protective effects of IFITM3 were rendered inactive. This allowed the influenza virus to easily infect the cells.

"When we treated lung cancer cells with the anti-fungal drug, we saw the anti-viral protection from IFITM3 pretty much disappear."

Christopher Chin, co-first author from the University of Massachusetts Medical School

To fully understand the affects Amphotericin B has on IFITM proteins, the team treated mice with the anti-fungal drug. Once the mice contracted influenza, they displayed the same flu symptoms as mice completely lacking the protective IFITM3 gene. In the absence of the influenza virus, the mice treated with the Amphotericin B showed no signs of illness.

Previous studies from the Sanger Institute found that people who have a genetic variant in the IFITM3 gene are more susceptible to severe influenza than people without the variant.

This research indicates that patients undergoing Amphotericin B anti-fungal treatments could potentially lose the protective effects of IFITM3. The loss of IFITM3 could increase the risk of flu infections in patients with already compromised immune systems.

"Sometimes a very useful drug can also have unforeseen effects. We now see that a major part of the body's natural defences to influenza virus is rendered inactive by Amphotericin B in cells and mice. It's our hope that reporting the consequences of this interaction may stimulate further translational studies and potentially guide patient care."

Dr Abraham Brass, senior author in the Microbiology and Physiological Systems Dept. at University of Massachusetts Medical School

The researchers agree that further work is now needed to evaluate if this effect has any clinical significance for patients receiving Amphotericin B-based treatments.

"It's a fascinating study, and vital that we now work out if these effects in mice are also seen in people. Patients on amphotericin often have complicated medical conditions and may be immune supressed; we need to work out if the treatments these patients were getting for other conditions made their influenza worse, as seen in the mice. If this is the case, we need to vaccinate those at risk, use these treatments sparingly and give antiviral drugs as early as possible when flu is developing. Clinical studies are urgently needed."

Professor Peter Openshaw, Director of the Centre for Respiratory Infections, Imperial College London

This research was part of an ongoing collaboration between University of Massachusetts Medical School and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.

Notes to Editors
Publications
  • Amphotericin B increases influenza A virus infection by preventing IFITM3-mediated restriction.

    Lin TY, Chin CR, Everitt AR, Clare S, Perreira JM et al.

    Cell reports 2013;5;4;895-908

Funding

This work was funded by the Charles H Hood Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Wellcome Trust.

Participating Centres
  • Department of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
  • Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, M.I.T. and Harvard University, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
  • Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK
  • Eidgeno¨ ssische Technische Hochschule, Deutsch English Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
  • Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 4000 Jones Bridge Road, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
  • MRC/UCL Centre for Medical Molecular Virology, Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, Gower Street, London W1CE 6BT, UK
Selected Websites
Contact the Press Office

Dr Samantha Wynne, Media Officer

Tel +44 (0)1223 492 368

Emily Mobley, Media Officer

Tel +44 (0)1223 496 851

Wellcome Sanger Institute,
Hinxton,
Cambridgeshire,
CB10 1SA,
UK

Mobile +44 (0) 7900 607793

Recent News

Genome damage from CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing higher than thought

Caution required for using CRISPR/Cas9 in potential gene therapies

Roots of leukaemia reveal possibility of predicting people at risk

Mutations in blood identify individuals at high risk of developing leukaemia

Cholera spread tracked at household level

The results could be used by public health officials to improve cholera control strategies